Tokenising real-world assets can make assets such as bonds, property, commodities and other investments easier to transfer and potentially more accessible. But putting an asset on a blockchain doesn’t automatically eliminate the risks attached to the underlying asset. Investors still have to consider ownership rights, regulation, custody, valuation and what happens if the company managing the asset fails. There is also the question of whether a token genuinely represents the real-world asset it claims to represent. As tokenisation expands, should investors focus more on the blockchain technology or on the legal and financial structure behind the token?
Blockchain technology could give musicians new ways to distribute music, sell digital ownership, reward fans, and potentially receive royalties directly from their audiences. Tokenised music could also allow fans to gain access to exclusive content or participate in revenue-sharing models, although legal ownership and copyright remain complicated issues. As artists look for alternatives to traditional music platforms, could tokenisation create a new way for musicians and fans to interact?
Tokenisation is expanding beyond real estate and government bonds into areas such as stocks, commodities, intellectual property, and private credit. Financial institutions and blockchain companies are investing heavily in this sector, believing it could transform how assets are owned and traded. As adoption continues to grow, do you think tokenisation is ready to scale globally, or are regulation and infrastructure still holding it back?
When people think of tokenisation, real estate often comes to mind, but the technology has far broader applications. Today, governments are exploring tokenised bonds, companies are experimenting with tokenised stocks, and industries are looking at tokenising commodities, carbon credits, artwork, intellectual property, and even event tickets. As blockchain adoption grows, tokenisation could reshape how ownership is recorded and transferred across multiple sectors. Which use case do you think has the greatest potential to transform the way we invest and own assets?
Tokenisation is moving beyond individual markets, with financial institutions exploring blockchain-based settlement across currencies and jurisdictions. BIS’s Project Agorá has demonstrated multi-currency settlement using tokenised central bank reserves and commercial bank deposits, while India is also preparing its first tokenised corporate bond issue. If assets can eventually be issued, traded, and settled across borders on compatible blockchain infrastructure, tokenisation could make global markets significantly more connected. Could cross-border tokenisation become one of blockchain’s biggest real-world use cases?
Gold has traditionally required investors to buy physical bars and coins, use financial products or rely on other forms of exposure. Tokenisation offers another possibility: representing ownership or economic exposure to gold through blockchain-based tokens. This could make transfers faster and potentially allow smaller amounts of gold exposure to be traded digitally. But investors still need to understand what stands behind the token, where the gold is stored, who holds it, how ownership is verified and whether the token can actually be redeemed. Does putting gold on a blockchain make the asset more useful, or is it simply a new way of packaging something investors already understand?
Imagine gifting someone a diamond ring where the physical stone comes with a blockchain-based token representing its ownership or authenticity. Tokenisation could potentially make it easier to verify the history of a diamond, transfer ownership and maintain a digital record alongside the physical asset. For something as personal and valuable as jewellery, that could add an interesting layer of transparency and provenance. But it also raises practical questions: would people actually want a digital token attached to a traditional gift, and who would be responsible for maintaining the connection between the physical diamond and its digital record? Could tokenised jewellery become a genuine luxury trend?
Web3 has already gone through several major growth phases driven by DeFi, NFTs, gaming, tokenisation, and other emerging technologies. The next catalyst could come from a completely different direction, such as consumer applications, blockchain-based infrastructure, payments, digital ownership, or something that hasn’t gained mainstream attention yet. What do you think could bring the next major wave of users and investment into Web3?
Back in 2021, RBI introduced a security rule with the card tokenisation to safeguard companies from hackers or spammers. But Apple was not ready for this so it stopped bank and credit card payment methods. Now Apple has finally reintroducing card payments to make Apple App Store and iCloud Transactions purchases. Almost after five years! .
Tokenisation of real-world assets (RWAs) has become one of the fastest-growing sectors in crypto, with everything from government bonds and real estate to private credit and commodities moving on-chain. Supporters believe tokenisation could make investing more accessible, improve liquidity, and reduce settlement times. However, widespread adoption still faces regulatory and infrastructure challenges. Is tokenisation finally ready for the mainstream, or is the industry still a few years away?
For years, crypto has been criticised for being driven more by speculation than real-world adoption. However, stablecoins, tokenisation, prediction markets, and blockchain-based payments are gaining traction across industries. Is the market finally shifting from hype-driven narratives to products with genuine utility?
A few years ago, NFTs were one of the hottest trends in the crypto industry, with digital artwork, collectibles, and profile picture projects generating billions in trading volume. Today, however, NFT discussions have largely faded from the spotlight, while newer narratives such as AI, tokenisation, and memecoins dominate headlines. Some believe NFTs were a speculative bubble that eventually burst, while others argue the technology is still valuable and simply waiting for more practical use cases. Were NFTs ahead of their time, or was the hype always destined to fade?
